XingLo SkillSearch

功能逻辑与界面原型验证

用于在正式开发前用一次性原型验证关键设计问题,分为“逻辑/状态模型”和“界面设计”两条路线。逻辑路线会制作可直接操作的轻量演示,让用户通过不同场景观察状态变化;界面路线会在同一路由中生成多套明显不同的 UI 方案并快速切换比较。它刻意避免测试、持久化、过度抽象和生产级打磨,把重点放在尽快回答“这个逻辑是否合理”或“这个界面应该长什么样”,适合功能设计、状态机验证和 UI 方案探索。

在 AI 中使用此 Skill将本页链接复制给 AI,即可让 AI 获取完整 Skill 内容并按此执行
安全提示: 本站 Skill 均经 ChatGPT 最新模型扫描,未发现恶意脚本及危险指令、未检出已知恶意行为特征,但不保证绝对安全,使用即表示接受此风险

Skill 文件

版本 20260819 · 3aff349f3c635e1c678281fd8b3b2820

agents/
SKILL.md
---
name: prototype
description: Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.
---

# Prototype

A prototype is **throwaway code that answers a question**. The question decides the shape.

## Pick a branch

Identify which question is being answered, using the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around:

- **"Does this logic / state model feel right?"** → [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md). Build a single shareable HTML file (free-play buttons plus tabbed guided walkthroughs) that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper, and that a non-developer can drive.
- **"What should this look like?"** → [UI.md](UI.md). Generate several radically different UI variations on a single route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar.

The two branches produce very different artifacts, so getting this wrong wastes the whole prototype. If the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user isn't reachable, default to whichever branch better matches the surrounding code (a backend module → logic; a page or component → UI) and state the assumption at the top of the prototype.

## Rules that apply to both

1. **Throwaway from day one, and clearly marked as such.** Locate the prototype code close to where it will actually be used (next to the module or page it's prototyping for) so context is obvious, but name it so a casual reader can see it's a prototype, not production. For throwaway UI routes, obey whatever routing convention the project already uses; don't invent a new top-level structure.
2. **Trivial to run.** A UI prototype starts from one command in the project's task runner: `pnpm <name>`, `python <path>`, `bun <path>`, etc. A logic demo is a single HTML file the user double-clicks. Either way, no thinking required to start it.
3. **No persistence by default.** State lives in memory. Persistence is the thing the prototype is _checking_, not something it should depend on. If the question explicitly involves a database, hit a scratch DB or a local file with a clear "PROTOTYPE, wipe me" name.
4. **Skip the polish.** No tests, no error handling beyond what makes the prototype _runnable_, no abstractions. The point is to learn something fast.
5. **Surface the state.** After every action (logic) or on every variant switch (UI), print or render the full relevant state so the user can see what changed.
6. **Capture it when done.** Fold any validated decision into the real code, then capture the prototype itself as a **primary source**: commit it to a throwaway branch, out of main, and leave a context pointer to that branch on the implementation issue. Capture the answer too (the verdict and the question it settled) in the issue or a commit. The main branch keeps only the validated decision.